First, related to the worker transitions, let me say
that all the service providers, provincial transition teams and elected
officials are very present and aware and attending multiple meetings. Everyone
has the best of intentions as they tackle this worker transition phase.
Sometimes those best intentions don’t work for those wearing the hardhat.
In Literacy World, we talk about “The Man in the
Middle.” The MM is the learner or student or in this case, the transitioning
worker. We know everything about our work depends, not on the funders and their
needs and wants, not on our organizations’ needs and wants, but rather on the
Man in the Middle. The workers, male and female, is why we are here. We must
earn their trust and their confidence. If we mess up, they will not come back.
Sometimes I think we have the best job in the world.
We get to talk to folks and learn not only what they need, but what skills and
talents they already hold. We often find out pretty interesting things about
folks that you may not know by looking at them. All of them have a story. And
we get to hear that story. When we do our job well, we get to listen to their
stories and provide them some hope and dignity around the skills and knowledge
they do have.
Right now, in Houston, it is the transitioning workers
who are our Men in the Middle. And yes, there are women in this mix as well. Our
mill worker (MM) is starting to feel a little lost as he runs around the
community, attending town hall meetings, making appointments, writing resumes,
collecting business cards and brochures, and placing phone calls. He is doing
everything in his power to make sure his transition is as smooth as possible.
He is a little fragile. He is told, by one service provider he will need to do
an assessment for reading, document use and numeracy. In LiteracySpeak, this
would be a TOWES type Essential Skills assessment. He is given a number and a
website and told he needs a computer with certain specifications. His computer
at home is not up to the task. He finds out through “word of mouth” that he can
come to the college and we will help him get set up in our lab. Our adult basic
education instructor is given strict instructions, by the other service
provider, NOT to assist the workers in ANY way with the assessment. Not even
the fragile ones. It would supposedly bias their results.
The tutorial at the start of the assessment has a
baby-faced Sponge-bob style computer walk the test taker through all the
special moves required for this particular assessment test. How to use the
mouse to cut and paste, highlight and so forth. (Do you recall the first time
you used a mouse?) When the real assessment starts, Sponge-bob is long gone.
The questions relate to workplace materials so language is no longer childlike,
the documents have excess information and distractors, and chances are good
that the first answer that comes to our Man in the Middle is obvious, but
perhaps not correct. The answer then needs to be formatted in a way the
computer understands. How do you write 68 cents when they give you a box and a
$ sign? $0.68 or would $.68 work? Certainly $68 would be wrong, but for our
worker who does not have a computer, I wonder how long he searches for a cent
sign, or feels confused that the answer is in dollars. Many of these workers do
not use computers, “if they can help it”. MM is already stressed. One more
parameter to add: time. This is a timed test of 90 minutes. Up goes the stress.
Training dollars are at stake. Unfamiliar surroundings. Unfamiliar media. A
test. Timed. High stakes. All adding to our already stressed Man in the Middle.
What are the odds that the test score will reflect the actual skills of the
worker?
Don’t get me wrong. Assessments are necessary for both
the Man in the Middle and the service provider. Workplace essential skills do
provide an idea of how the worker is able to apply his literacy skills to
workplace situations. I am not convinced that for these workers, at this time,
this testing format is appropriate. What is being assessed?
There are alternative assessment methods. They involve
conversations, checklists and discussions around the Man in the Middle’s
current skills in his current workplace. They give the assessee a voice and
dignity. I know that the literacy practitioners I work with could spend a
couple of hours with a worker using free printable materials from Human
Resources and Development Canada, the creators of “Essential Skills”, and be
able to identify the worker’s skills much more accurately, and within context,
than a complicated computer-based test that, through its design, increases
anxiety and stress.
How are the Houston workers doing with their
transition? Some great. A few have challenged exams and worked through Prior
Learning Assessment portfolios to the point that they have achieved an Adult
Dogwood Certificate (BC Grade 12). In these cases, families, practitioners and
the Man in the Middle are proud and empowered to move forward. Is there another
job out there for them? We all have our fingers crossed.
Others have shown up for the online assessment and
been so stressed, that I am convinced the results will be impaired. Another
gentleman was told he would require computer training, so he was slotted into a
special transition-worker beginner computer course 6 weeks from now. Six weeks
is a long time to wait for someone trying to be pro-active. He then became our
Man in the Middle as he independently sought computer help for before and after
the upcoming computer course. I watched as he used a calendar to calculate his
strange shift sequence so he could determine when his first days off (on day
shift) after the holidays would fall. Extraneous information inadvertently
included a 2015 calendar. Document use: Level 3-4. I was excited as I could see
he will learn quickly. He graciously exuded thanks. Nice, but unnecessary.
When your job disappears, out from under you, through
no fault of your own, it is not the piles of papers, the Seven Important Steps,
the computer assessment or the fancy brochure of services that will save you.
What will save you is the compassion and understanding of the people in your community
who are working alongside you in your transition journey. As service providers,
we all need to keep dignity as part of the process. Is there an online
assessment for us?
For anyone who would like to try the TOWES test, this
print sample gives you an idea of the complexity.
Love this post and the detailed description of what is really happening to people caught in the Essential Skills nets. It seems so bizarre to be using inappropriate and poorly designed tests such as TOWES for the sake of, well, testing how well people do on tests, and how much computer access they have (a situation out of their control). The conclusion is powerful too, service providers can and should serve their community members much better: why make things so hard when we know how to really support people in ways they need and that the economy needs? The experience of the Man in the Middle also resonates with a Tyee article I read by Michael Valpy about the new "precariat": people forced into precarious jobs requiring little of the skills they possess and can learn, but instead a willingness to earn minimum wage in temporary, flexible work in which they are forever disposable. And this from corporations who earn government subsidies paid for off the backs of these very workers. http://thetyee.ca/News/2013/12/31/Precariat-Jobs/
ReplyDeleteYes Sasha - I see the tie in. (This is Dee.)
ReplyDeleteIt is mostly the industrial east referenced in the article, but the resource extraction west is in exactly the same place. Good, secure, well-paid jobs with benefits that build lifestyles and communities that are no longer the norm. The implications go from the individual, personal stories of "throw away workers" to the all encompassing concerns around the implications for Canada's standard of living. And throughout all of it, The Man (Woman, Youth) in the Middle is often valued only through the pin-hole lens of the Canadian economy and his current place in it.