A few years ago we were
involved in a national project where literacy practitioners were supported to
look at an element of their work through a research lens. Storytellers’ Foundation
was the community organization on a BC team that also included Leona Gadsby and
Marina Niks. There were other teams from across Canada doing similar work. The
national project was called, “Connecting the Dots”. We learned a lot. This research
project gave us space away from the busyness of “doing” literacy to give
attention to something that has always been of interest to us at Storytellers’.
We were able to research about the interplay between literacy and social
capital.
Often people think of
literacy as a tool in developing our human capital. Human capital can be
thought of in contrast to financial capital. Financial capital is the cash,
stocks and bonds that reside in bank accounts. Human capital is the stocks of
knowledge, skills and personal attributes, which reside within us. Human
capital is embodied in our investment in education or job training. If you
agree with this definition of human capital then it seems to make sense that
literacy and human capital are intricately connected.
We live and work in the
Upper Skeena region. All our communities are on the Gitxsan First Nation
territories. Most of the people who access our community literacy and learning
programs are members of the Gitxsan First Nation. The goal of our literacy and
learning program is to support people to build the knowledge, skills and
confidence to become engaged citizens. For us to achieve success we needed to
know more about citizenship. For the Gitxsan First Nation a citizen must have
strong social capital to be engaged. Social capital is embodied in our
investment to have reciprocal relationships with our families and neighbours. It
means, for us, that literacy plays a role in increasing a person’s capacity for
unpaid work. It’s not always about getting a job. Social capital is also a
contrast to financial capital. Social capital describes the structures and
quality of social relationships between people. The Connecting the Dots project
helped us to learn how our literacy work can contribute to building social
capital. This led to us creating a social capital engagement rubric:
SOCIAL CAPITAL
GOODWILL -
SENSE OF BELONGING - SOCIAL TRUST - INCLUSIVENESS - CIVIC RESPONSIBILITY - RECIPROCITY
Social capital is a way of looking
at the trusting relationships we have in our personal lives and in our
community life.
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
AVOIDANCE
|
AWARENESS
|
WAKE UP
|
ENGAGEMENT
|
ACCESS
|
ORGANIZER
|
“I’m disconnected”
|
“I see beyond myself”
|
“I influence”
|
“I effect change”
|
“I’m needed”
|
“I’m part of the glue”
|
This rubric helps us name
and measure how and when we are building social capital and how, through this
deepening of relationship with others, we are able to engage more in our
community. We’ve learned that the more people engage the stronger their social
capital and the more a person has social capital the greater their commitment
to act for the wellbeing of our community. This means we immerse our literacy
programming in community development work. Since we’ve done this we have
witnessed people entering our programming seeing themselves as only a learner
but soon we see them tapping in to their capacity as leaders and seeing
themselves as agents in making change, not only in their own lives but in the
lives of our community. This is having a powerful and political impact in our
community.
For example, it is that time
of year when we are starting our seeds indoors. We’re gearing up for another
season of growing and eventually selling produce. One of our literacy programs
is known as Youth Works. Youth
Works is a social enterprise that sells sandwiches to the local gas bar and
sells food at the local Farmers Market. Youth Works also takes young adults on
to the territories to harvest wild foods, especially berries, that they turn in
to delicious jams and jellies. The outcome of Youth Works is to nurture young
people who have been pushed to the margins to become happy, engaged citizens
who are in control of their lives and the life of their community.
As
we support these young adults to progress on the Social Capital Engagement
rubric, we encourage them to engage in real life community projects. This takes
courage.
Courtney
has courage. Courtney takes great pride
in selling at the Farmers Market and helping to run our local chapter of the BC
Farmers Market coupon program where anyone struggling economically can get
coupons that replace cash to buy local food. Courtney and her Youth Works
counterparts are building relationships while doing this. It means while they
engage, they build social capital with their neighbours. Courtney and her
counterparts are building a food community where famers, producers and, the
original hunters and gatherers, are starting to work and live together. When we
see Youth Works bringing more of their peers (mainly Gitxsan and Wet'suwet'en)
to the market not only as consumers but also as sellers, we see a future. The
learner has become a leader and is shaping the social, economic and political
future of our community.
Youth like Courtney are
blending the gathering from the territories with healthy backyard gardens and
small-scale community gardens. And they are showing a pride. They are taking a
lead role and they are finding a place for themselves inside their own
territories. This is an exciting story at any Farmers Market. When we think of our recent history in the
Upper Skeena, this story becomes a story of how literacy can be political and mobilizing.
The influences of colonialism, industrialization and corporatism has resulted
in an even higher incidence of people not producing food locally in an area
where malnourishment is common and where being able to feed ourselves was historically
commonplace. The legacy has left a
difficult relationship between local “foodies” and First Nation people. Now
that is changing because of people like Courtney. Our market is bringing
together First Nation and non-first nation. It is bridging culture,
socio-economic class and it is healing wounds. Our market demonstrates a local
living economy where harvesting from the land can be unpaid work and it can
allow youth like Courtney to engage in the cash economy. Courtenay’s story is a
literacy story. It demonstrates that literacy is a key lever in building
community capacity. And it highlights
that when the learner is supported to participate in community life, and increase
social capital, they become agent. The quality of their relationships mobilizes
them to continue to engage.
Hi Anne, great blog post! I have been thinking lately about the local food movement. We try to emphasize accessing local food at our community kitchen program, to buy and to gather, in many ways though, I'm seeing that good food, food that should be accessible to all, becoming a symbol of affluence. Buying local food can be expensive for those who are living in poverty. (Not always...but sometimes). I have been trying to find a way to unify community and it seems as though food is becoming a dividing factor and has allowed another avenue for people to judge each other. It has become competitive at times to demonstrate how "local" your food is...
ReplyDeleteCan you provide some commentary on this idea? It has been troubling me. Cheers, Joanne
Hi Joanne, thanks for commenting. Sorry, I've just figured how to respond. The thought of food, particularly local food, dividing rather than uniting us is really troublesome. We focus a lot on making food growing, harvesting, preserving, trading and selling for cash a community building activity. I too worry when I see food widening a gap rather than bringing us closer together. Come visit us in Hazelton and see what Janet and others are doing around food to make it a connector and maybe we can all learn from each other?
Delete